TOPIC: 2022 Common Final Kind of

Picc wrote:

Arcanist Kolixela wrote:

Matthew Hayward wrote: If I understand now how the Mystic Staffs work, it might be simpler to say instead:

"(To-hit calculated with INT or WIS)"

Instead of:

"(+ INT or WIS modifier to hit)"

The + led me to assume those things were added on top of normal DEX ranged to hit modifiers.

Same here.

I assumed the +INT/WIS was meant to compensate for the spellcaster classes sacrificing dexterity and strength for spelldamage tokens.

If it's STR+INT/WIS at melee for to hit and DEX+INT/WIS at range for to hit it actually builds us to somewhat viable bonuses where we may hit in Nightmare on something other than a nat 20.

STR+INT/WIS at melee + DEX+INT/WIS at range sounds like a coaching nightmare waiting to happen. Can we just put a link directly to tdcharactorcreator.com right on the token (only half kidding)

I'd like to suggest that of we ever think putting the TokenDB link on a common is important, we've probably overcomplicated things. The same applies to UC and R as well in my mind.

Fiddy wrote:

Picc wrote:

Arcanist Kolixela wrote:

Matthew Hayward wrote: If I understand now how the Mystic Staffs work, it might be simpler to say instead:

"(To-hit calculated with INT or WIS)"

Instead of:

"(+ INT or WIS modifier to hit)"

The + led me to assume those things were added on top of normal DEX ranged to hit modifiers.

Same here.

I assumed the +INT/WIS was meant to compensate for the spellcaster classes sacrificing dexterity and strength for spelldamage tokens.

If it's STR+INT/WIS at melee for to hit and DEX+INT/WIS at range for to hit it actually builds us to somewhat viable bonuses where we may hit in Nightmare on something other than a nat 20.

STR+INT/WIS at melee + DEX+INT/WIS at range sounds like a coaching nightmare waiting to happen. Can we just put a link directly to tdcharactorcreator.com right on the token (only half kidding)

I'd like to suggest that of we ever think putting the TokenDB link on a common is important, we've probably overcomplicated things. The same applies to UC and R as well in my mind.

I dont think it's to complex, I just dont look forward to finding time to adjudicate it in coaching. The same applies to most of the +/- stat tokens at uncommon or rare. Common tends not to be so bad since the players using them tend to have less tokens over all.