I'm going to take one more stab at an idea for the Wizard Medallion - and if happens to be received with universal acclimation by Wizards perhaps TBTP would consider it seriously.
Let me take you back, way, way back to August 21st, when horse and buggy was the common mode of transportation and this was the Wizard transmute:
At that time, Wizards did not coalesce around this token largely because they could not agree about how the Familiar aspect should be.
Since then, the Spellbook UR concept has been removed. (Returning to a design process near you in 2022?)
Dream with me - what if we:
a.
Start with the Relic/Legendary above.
b. Remove UR Jinn's Spellbook, and
replace it with plain old UR MeC as printed in 2021.
c.
Drop the familiar aspect from the Legendary.
That's it!
Relic: MeC + 1 extra spell at each level castable as a free action.
Legendary: MeC + 2 extra spells at each level castable as a free action.
If TPTB are concerned that these extra spells are going to get bogged down with a bunch of confusing interactions, have them come from the token itself like Ring of Spell Storing - "May cast 1 (relic) or 2 (legendary) spells of each level for free as a free action." That would eliminate cheese like trying to mix this in with Ring of Power for a free action cast of a level 1 spell each room or having Restore Spell or Crown of Expertise being used to generate more free action spells.
This has something for everyone, I think:
Doesn't have awkward power differences for Elf Wizard and Wizard.
Plenty 'o free actions for former MMM users.
An extra charm slot for Charm Necklace users who used to use MeC.
Might shake up builds for Cabal Set users.
MeC still has flavor and dramatic downside of 10 HP per use.
MeC like effects not getting expanded or improved, which may be endorsed by Dr. Uid
For Wizards, I invite you to consider - would you rather have what's described here, or what's currently in the first post? Because we're running out of runway to coalesce around something - and this one has the advantage of being very similar to something that was on the table in the past.
I'm more or less OK with the one currently in Jeff's post #1 of this thread.
But I would much rather have what I described in this post.
What say you?