TOPIC: Deciphering the Relic Fragment Riddle

Fiddy wrote: I think the clue was saying that we're jumping the gun.

We need to wait before we can make more progress.

I took it to mean lots of the speculation we have made was wild and down right ridiculous. If he wanted us to get that we were Jumping the gun from a clue with Gordon Jump in it, it feels like he was stretching to get us there with the clue of Gordon Jump and asking what Gordon does vs who Gordon is. I dunno, but I am not connecting the two that way.

I do think it does prove 100% that include Gordon Jump was not a mistake but a meaningful choice. That choice I admit could that you are correct it is that we have jumped the gun or shark or something.

Cliff wrote: Maybe Raven could add links to the first post in this thread.

I am literally heading out of the house right now (My Sig. Other is saying, "We're all good to go! Tent trailer is packed! Are you done with TD forums yet?") and we'll be goine camping for a week with limited internet access (thus me spedning every spare moment of my morning hitting "refresh" here)

But it was my plan to make a "What we know" thread for the Riddle.... if folks can wait a week.

If not, someone else is welcome to make the new thread.

If people want to restate what we "know" I can put together a new info graphic

(Ill search the thread but I might miss stuff)

We also need a what clues exist. What we know about said clues. What we don't know about said clues....Though that really would just be we don't know anything...lol...what we tried??? I don''t know.

Here's where I'm at after that last clue...

Question: What does Gordon do? Answer: He "Jumps." Could this mean we're jumping to conclusions or that we need to jump from Con to Con to collect all of the Relic Fragments? Remember, we don't know that there are only 6. Origins could just be the first source.

"While I think it's nice that y'all are trying
half of the time you're all way off the mark,
almost as if you were inserting what you all
think you want it to be, not what it should be."

>>>Like others have said, I think this means we're falling for the red herrings and putting our past knowledge into play more than we should.

"Different ways of thinking are frequently, if not
often the best way to go. I guess you might
effectively consider it to be thinking outside of
some kind of rectangular enclosure."

>>>It's not a special treasure draw box like in year's past.

"Go ahead and stretch your thoughts. You've heard of
opening your mind, I'm sure. This, you know,
really should be a thing that the community can
do all together. Use this exercise to show how
otherwise disparate people can come together,
no matter what their geographical locations are."

>>>Community building exercise? Like I mention above, could this mean that Origins is just the first place we will be collecting fragments so we will have to rely on each other to trade in order to get a full set of fragments? Remember, we don't know that there are only 6.

"Dodging the things that are right in front of you,
or not immediately obvious isn't good, is it?"

>>>Does this mean we need to take a closer look at the tokens themselves?

My common sense says turning in the relic recipe fragments will get you a relic recipe.

Token guide seems to back that up.

Beyond that, I'm willing to wait and see.

Has anyone checked Druegar's avatar for clues?

Fiddy wrote: Has anyone checked Druegar's avatar for clues?

Has anyone checked Druegar for clues?!

Adam Guay wrote:

Fiddy wrote: Has anyone checked Druegar's avatar for clues?

Has anyone checked Druegar for clues?!

Adam Guay wrote:

Fiddy wrote: Has anyone checked Druegar's avatar for clues?

Has anyone checked Druegar for clues?!

He may enjoy that too much.

I think justice is looking for a Brownie of Gratitude!

Fiddy wrote:

Adam Guay wrote:

Fiddy wrote: Has anyone checked Druegar's avatar for clues?

Has anyone checked Druegar for clues?!

He may enjoy that too much.

Yup, checked when the teal pixels started to appear. Other then a single one on his hand that I blame on compression nothing to report in any of the frames, the file name, or the header