TOPIC: This is not the Post you are looking for Henwy. Move along.

I post here in between document reviews, staff management, strategy sessions, contract negotiations, and conference calls with clients and rival business associates. It's my newest escape hatch.

I love programmers because they have to be detail oriented to survive. That's why your comments here are so accurately on point.

Get rid of the starburst on the +2 sword entirely. Make text read: If result is  3 then wielder takes 3 dam. only

Changes to the Crown of Might make it not a choice for my wizard anymore.  Oh, well.  Now it will be between the Charm and the Circlet for me.  Great work, Jeff and forumites!  (I agree that the boots should be changed!)<br />

For the Double-Edged Sword, could we put something like 'If result is * no damage is dealt & wielder takes 3 pts. of damage '?<br />This seems completely unambiguous to me. Essentially no combat damage is dealt, the 3 pts. to the wielder is a magical effect and therefore not modifiable by anything that would normally affect combat. If people might still get confused we could say 'no combat damage is dealt' making it wordier but hopefully completely obvious.

<br />We have the Mithral Helm - goes with Mithral Sword from 2008.<br />

<br />The Mithral Chainmail from 2007 is also part of this set, so the 3 piece power is attainable now.<br /><br />

<br />Anything else?<br />

<br />I think that's all of them.<br /><br />Although the Rod of Seven Parts might technically classify as a set. (7-year set... wow...)

<br />I would personally like to see an "of the Underdark" and "Troll-hide" set as well someday.  =D<br /><br />

isn't the mithral chain mail part of the mithral set?

<br />Get rid of the starburst on the +2 sword entirely. Make text read: If result is  3 then wielder takes 3 dam. only<br />

<br /><br />The problem with that is DMs could add in damage bonuses, Bardsong, and even a critical.  There are too many ways for this to get screwed up.  And I get to answer all the nasty-grams!  I think I will just put a "0" in the burst.

I just didn't want to see the three disappear and I thought it could be worded in a way to eliminate those kind of mistakes.

<br /><br />I would personally like to see an "of the Underdark" and "Troll-hide" set as well someday.  =D<br /><br /><br />

I would like to see an Undead Hunter(slayer) Set.

<br /><br />Wearing a complete "Might" set gives monsters +2 to hit the wearer since they despise those items, but does it mean the wearer will be the first targeted in combat?<br /><br />

<br /><br />No monster's won't attack them with preference, but when they do they get +2 to hit.  (There could be 2-3 of these things in a party).