TOPIC: Great New Online Token Database!

Druegar wrote: I'm considering flagging Legendary tokens with the first year they were printed, but I don't want to lose the "yearless" classification because they are, in fact, timeless. To do this, I would tag each legendary with the first year it was printed as well as the yearless tag.

And lo, it is done .

And we looked, and saw that it was Good.


(Well, pretty good. Except maybe for Byrs Anointed Redoubt Plate which is only yearless with no first-printing year, and Charm of Avarice which has 2 first printing years. Tho that might be 2 years referring to the Relic and then the Legendary versions?)

Raven wrote: Charm of Avarice which has 2 first printing years. Tho that might be 2 years referring to the Relic and then the Legendary versions?

That's correct.

Raven wrote: Byrs Anointed Redoubt Plate which is only yearless with no first-printing year

fixed, thanks for catching that
Please enjoy a glass of milk.

I noticed that most of the Artifacts have the "yearless" classification.

But I noticed two exceptions were: +3 Holy Great Sword and Smackdown’s Charm of Comraderie which have specific years.


Not sure if that was by design, or just an omission.

As always, thanks for your constant efforts to maintain and improve the TokenDB.

Just a really small thing.
I also noticed that most of the searchable terms / classifications are capitalized, but "yearless", "slotless", and "not exchangeable" were not. That difference sticks out, at least to me.

Graven wrote: I noticed that most of the Artifacts have the "yearless" classification.

But I noticed two exceptions {snip} Not sure if that was by design, or just an omission.

A little of both.
Since the artifacts don't have year icons, they are classified as yearless. But since I now include debut year for legedaries, doing that for artifacts seems completely appropriate.

However, I'll probably not add the yearless tag to the +3HGS because of the unusual circumstances of its creation.

As for why +3 Holy Great Sword and Smackdown’s Charm of Comraderie [sic] had years... it's because they have year icons on them.

Thanks for bringing those to my attention. Please enjoy a glass of milk.


Artifact Owners: If I have the creation year wrong, please let me know. I'm not at all sure about the warmaul.

Graven wrote: most of the searchable terms / classifications are capitalized, but "yearless", "slotless", and "not exchangeable" were not. That difference sticks out, at least to me.

Good! It was intended to stand out.

Druegar wrote: But since I now include debut year for legedaries, doing that for artifacts seems completely appropriate.

Cool. I was hoping you would do that.

Btw thanks for the milk.

What modifier does Scroll Shocking Grasp use to determine its AC-15 to-hit bonus: Melee or Ranged?

tokendb.com/token/scroll-shocking-grasp/

Or is it unmodified AC-15?

Matthew Hayward wrote: What modifier does Scroll Shocking Grasp use to determine its AC-15 to-hit bonus: Melee or Ranged?

tokendb.com/token/scroll-shocking-grasp/

Or is it unmodified AC-15?

Scrolls are unmodified.

Ring of Stunning Fist has erratum because of the changes to the Stunning/Dazing Fist mechanic on the monk class cards.

Druegar wrote: Ring of Stunning Fist has erratum because of the changes to the Stunning/Dazing Fist mechanic on the monk class cards.

Cool.

I was willing to just have the token be useless now, but the errata is very nice.