TOPIC: All the Final 2026 Token Images!

The belt could basically be called redoubt belt at this point - Remove the -2 save at relic.

it’s not ideal, but it’s hardly the most broken item this year. That’s reserved for the Arcanum ring

Thanks for a great looking token year!

A little disappointed in the final images, as there isn't really a good Druid item in the bunch. Hopefully we can get a UR trinket next year.

OrionW wrote: A little disappointed in the final images, as there isn't really a good Druid item in the bunch. Hopefully we can get a UR trinket next year.

Hopefully we do get the Iktomi boost this year.

OrionW wrote: A little disappointed in the final images, as there isn't really a good Druid item in the bunch. Hopefully we can get a UR trinket next year.

I mean, there's plenty of good stuff for newer and mid-level casters (including druids) in here. +3 ranged damage in feet, +2 ranged damage in a transmute Ioun Stone, +2 focus in a neck slot with some other nice bumps.

The new focus Rod and the focus eypatch transmute path are still in print from 2025, as are ranged damage belt and the bead that lets you use a power or spell without marking off the class card - extra spell surge!

I'd say that casters in general have a pretty good wealth of in print options going into 2026.

No UR is needed in higher end build's just for collectors and those who want the arcanum greaves. Relic and legendary crossbow and rings are not needed. Earcuff of Glory, Path or Mark are the only possible needs in 2026. The rest have older tokens just as good and cheaper.

Be interesting to see what tokens sales drop too based on the 2026 set of tokens.

edwin wrote: No UR is needed in higher end build's just for collectors and those who want the arcanum greaves. Relic and legendary crossbow and rings are not needed. Earcuff of Glory, Path or Mark are the only possible needs in 2026. The rest have older tokens just as good and cheaper..

Define needed? The vampire rings makes every melee build in appropriate rarity builds. Even my Cleric and Druid builds want them. Relsa’s, Muk’s, Craven, and Arcanum (once I have EGG anyway). Fighter/Barbarian/Monk/Paladin/Ranger Goes Muk’s, Craven, Arcanum, Eel.

Endgame wrote:

edwin wrote: No UR is needed in higher end build's just for collectors and those who want the arcanum greaves. Relic and legendary crossbow and rings are not needed. Earcuff of Glory, Path or Mark are the only possible needs in 2026. The rest have older tokens just as good and cheaper..

Define needed? The vampire rings makes every melee build in appropriate rarity builds. Even my Cleric and Druid builds want them. Relsa’s, Muk’s, Craven, and Arcanum (once I have EGG anyway). Fighter/Barbarian/Monk/Paladin/Ranger Goes Muk’s, Craven, Arcanum, Eel.

+5 Damage on the legendary ring is meh for me. I am scratching my head at why it isn't a +6 to damage. It doesn't have the flexibility of Muk's to be used in range, and the healing benefit is not enough to justify the loss of +1 damage. I am sure there are folks that are going to be interested, but I just don't feel the need to have the item.

The crossbow feels very build dependent. It is good to see more ranged weapons, but putting it out with an underpowered ring feels like we will see a lot less transmutes this year. Collectors will pick up both for sure, but I am not sure how many builds they will make it into.

Mike Steele wrote:

OrionW wrote: A little disappointed in the final images, as there isn't really a good Druid item in the bunch. Hopefully we can get a UR trinket next year.

Hopefully we do get the Iktomi boost this year.

I hope so for sure. It feels like talk about boosting Iktomi's is an evergreen topic that comes up every token design phase, but is always sill on the to do list. It will be nice to see a final version of that item we can build around.

OrionW wrote:

Endgame wrote:

edwin wrote: No UR is needed in higher end build's just for collectors and those who want the arcanum greaves. Relic and legendary crossbow and rings are not needed. Earcuff of Glory, Path or Mark are the only possible needs in 2026. The rest have older tokens just as good and cheaper..

Define needed? The vampire rings makes every melee build in appropriate rarity builds. Even my Cleric and Druid builds want them. Relsa’s, Muk’s, Craven, and Arcanum (once I have EGG anyway). Fighter/Barbarian/Monk/Paladin/Ranger Goes Muk’s, Craven, Arcanum, Eel.

+5 Damage on the legendary ring is meh for me. I am scratching my head at why it isn't a +6 to damage. It doesn't have the flexibility of Muk's to be used in range, and the healing benefit is not enough to justify the loss of +1 damage. I am sure there are folks that are going to be interested, but I just don't feel the need to have the item.

The crossbow feels very build dependent. It is good to see more ranged weapons, but putting it out with an underpowered ring feels like we will see a lot less transmutes this year.

+1 damage is roughly 1-2% of a high end build. 20hp (expected hp gain over a 4 combat dungeon) is roughly 20-30% more hp for a run. It’s probably too good of a trade honestly, unless you’re playing down so much you don’t take damage on a run. For someone using melee and getting into Legendaries next year, I’ll recommend Craven over Muk’s 10 times out of 10.

OrionW wrote:

Mike Steele wrote:

OrionW wrote: A little disappointed in the final images, as there isn't really a good Druid item in the bunch. Hopefully we can get a UR trinket next year.

Hopefully we do get the Iktomi boost this year.

I hope so for sure. It feels like talk about boosting Iktomi's is an evergreen topic that comes up every token design phase, but is always sill on the to do list. It will be nice to see a final version of that item we can build around.

I agree. I am very optimistic that it gets done this time. Obvious fixes include giving the air elemental form the ranged attack ability the Trinket had, and removing the one form per room restriction.

OrionW wrote:

Endgame wrote:

edwin wrote: No UR is needed in higher end build's just for collectors and those who want the arcanum greaves. Relic and legendary crossbow and rings are not needed. Earcuff of Glory, Path or Mark are the only possible needs in 2026. The rest have older tokens just as good and cheaper..

Define needed? The vampire rings makes every melee build in appropriate rarity builds. Even my Cleric and Druid builds want them. Relsa’s, Muk’s, Craven, and Arcanum (once I have EGG anyway). Fighter/Barbarian/Monk/Paladin/Ranger Goes Muk’s, Craven, Arcanum, Eel.

+5 Damage on the legendary ring is meh for me. I am scratching my head at why it isn't a +6 to damage. It doesn't have the flexibility of Muk's to be used in range, and the healing benefit is not enough to justify the loss of +1 damage. I am sure there are folks that are going to be interested, but I just don't feel the need to have the item.

You can equip multiple rings.

So it's not trading 1 damage for some healing vs. Muk's Ring in melee builds.

It's trading against whatever is the worst of your 2, 3, or 4 rings - which won't be Muk's Ring.