TOPIC: 2023 Treasure Pulls Sheet

docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rI4ARi3g6nsIyN_jzLuljiYKgiVwotZQaANvq0GbL9Q/edit?usp=sharing

Please let me know if the columns make sense. I've seen a few people post up older legendary tokens (Widseth's, Sill's), not just older relics. Please let me know if there are any other items or surprises I should add. Also, I'm not sure if there are new elemental greaves or -ward amulets. Columns are in there for now; we can always add.

Also, I plan to add a Summary tab at some point. WIll have it there by the time V12 comes around.

Thanks for creating this!

It seems there aren't R/UC Greaves (besides Stalker) or box-only Amulets this year. At least nobody has claimed to find any yet. No harm in leaving the columns for now though.

I copied my VTD 9B numbers over from BC's spreadsheet.

Much appreciated!

And yeah, no harm leaving to columns for the moment. Can always remove them.

Thanks so much for doing this and really encourage everyone to take a little time to input the results of their treasure pulls. It helps all of us to level set expectations regarding treasure and plan accordingly. It's also fun.

Column J should be K to S + U instead of K to AF, N to S, and U.

Ian Lee wrote: Column J should be K to S + U instead of K to AF, N to S, and U.

The ring has been going in auctions for prices comparable to URs, so I don't mind including it, if any are pulled. Basically, I think the formula in row 4 is correct and should be used as basis for the individual percentages.

I miss the total column. It helps me to make sure I didn't miss count or mis enter.

Also, the relic should be greater bead of Whispers.

What total count are you missing? Column B should be the grand total of all your pulls.

Dave wrote:

Ian Lee wrote: Column J should be K to S + U instead of K to AF, N to S, and U.

The ring has been going in auctions for prices comparable to URs, so I don't mind including it, if any are pulled. Basically, I think the formula in row 4 is correct and should be used as basis for the individual percentages.

Even if you include 4th, the formula in J (below J3) overlaps and includes things that aren't UR+. Can just reduce it to K to U, akin to how J3 counts.

Thanks for the catches on the individual formulas all! Knew I forgot to check something

Ian Lee wrote:

Dave wrote:

Ian Lee wrote: Column J should be K to S + U instead of K to AF, N to S, and U.

The ring has been going in auctions for prices comparable to URs, so I don't mind including it, if any are pulled. Basically, I think the formula in row 4 is correct and should be used as basis for the individual percentages.

Even if you include 4th, the formula in J (below J3) overlaps and includes things that aren't UR+. Can just reduce it to K to U, akin to how J3 counts.

I think we're saying the same thing, you just probably said it better. J4 basically just uses J3.