TOPIC: 2019 Treasure chips

Druegar wrote: Even in light of my plea to observe Wheaton's Law, I think I'm more sanguine about the presence of... less-than-always-pleasant posters. Every forum I've ever been a part of has its share of d-bags. I dare say any group of size is going to have them. This forum/group is no different. I can't help but wonder if some of the pilgarlics we had in the Good Old Days© were worse than the contemporary ones, but we haven't learned how to deal with them yet like we did the oldsters. 🤷‍♂️

Wade Schwendemann wrote:

Druegar wrote: Even in light of my plea to observe Wheaton's Law, I think I'm more sanguine about the presence of... less-than-always-pleasant posters. Every forum I've ever been a part of has its share of d-bags. I dare say any group of size is going to have them. This forum/group is no different. I can't help but wonder if some of the pilgarlics we had in the Good Old Days© were worse than the contemporary ones, but we haven't learned how to deal with them yet like we did the oldsters. 🤷‍♂️

I only had to look up 2 words in this post. I hope the over/under was 2.5

Endgame wrote:

Wade Schwendemann wrote:

Druegar wrote: Even in light of my plea to observe Wheaton's Law, I think I'm more sanguine about the presence of... less-than-always-pleasant posters. Every forum I've ever been a part of has its share of d-bags. I dare say any group of size is going to have them. This forum/group is no different. I can't help but wonder if some of the pilgarlics we had in the Good Old Days© were worse than the contemporary ones, but we haven't learned how to deal with them yet like we did the oldsters. 🤷‍♂️

I only had to look up 2 words in this post. I hope the over/under was 2.5

Only 1 for me - pilgarlic? Context covered it well enough, but still

Wade Schwendemann wrote:

Druegar wrote: Even in light of my plea to observe Wheaton's Law, I think I'm more sanguine about the presence of... less-than-always-pleasant posters. Every forum I've ever been a part of has its share of d-bags. I dare say any group of size is going to have them. This forum/group is no different. I can't help but wonder if some of the pilgarlics we had in the Good Old Days© were worse than the contemporary ones, but we haven't learned how to deal with them yet like we did the oldsters. 🤷‍♂️

I only had to look up 2 words in this post. I hope the over/under was 2.5

binia wrote:

Wade Schwendemann wrote:

Druegar wrote: Even in light of my plea to observe Wheaton's Law, I think I'm more sanguine about the presence of... less-than-always-pleasant posters. Every forum I've ever been a part of has its share of d-bags. I dare say any group of size is going to have them. This forum/group is no different. I can't help but wonder if some of the pilgarlics we had in the Good Old Days© were worse than the contemporary ones, but we haven't learned how to deal with them yet like we did the oldsters. 🤷‍♂️

I only had to look up 2 words in this post. I hope the over/under was 2.5

Guys, he had to look up pilgarlic and d-bag.

BTW, I remember some of the old days d-bags. I don’t miss them.