Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: 2020 QTR Beta (please proof)

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #25

Druegar wrote:

jedibcg wrote: Partially putting this on in here so Druegar checks that the numbers are correct and we don't have the issues we had last year of blanks in the wrong spots or wrong number.

I genuinely appreciate the nudge.
I have a new method of generating the blanks, so I have high confidence they are accurate. <crosses fingers>


Please mess up at least one blank for Jedi's sake... have mercy my lord!!!
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #26

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Enjoy Your Burrito
  • Posts: 8659

Arnold wrote: Are there plans to make an Adventurer's Guild 2020 token this year?

no
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections/suggestions in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously.
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #27

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Enjoy Your Burrito
  • Posts: 8659

Jeff321 wrote: Shirt of Shielding is already a thing :(

<rhymes with duck>! :pinch:
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections/suggestions in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously.
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #28

Druegar wrote:

Jeff321 wrote: Shirt of Shielding is already a thing :(

<rhymes with duck>! :pinch:


Exchange program?
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #29

  • Picc
  • Picc's Avatar
  • Offline
  • 8th Level
  • Supporter
  • Remember when we were explorers?
  • Posts: 5681
Off topic, I'm not sure how I feel about different vol tokens at different cons...
Semper Gumby, Always flexible.

Sartre sits in in a coffee shop and asks for a coffee without cream. The barista apologizes “Sorry, we don't have any cream. Can I offer you a coffee without milk instead?”
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #30

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Enjoy Your Burrito
  • Posts: 8659

edwin wrote: Will add more as I find them.

If by "add" you mean make additional posts, awesome! If you were to edit that post for the purposes of adding additional points, the new points will likely get overlooked. Not saying that was your intention, just wanting to cover the spread.
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections/suggestions in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously.
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #31

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Enjoy Your Burrito
  • Posts: 8659

Beertram wrote: Please mess up at least one blank for Jedi's sake... have mercy my lord!!!

:evil:
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections/suggestions in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously.
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #32

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Enjoy Your Burrito
  • Posts: 8659

edwin wrote: Does [Charm of Timely Aid] work on all initiative rolls or just players initiative roll?

just players' (updated to make that clear)

edwin wrote: [Dust of Revealing] How will the one creature be determined if there is more than one invisible creature? Does this include players who might be invisible in the determination of whom the user sees?

The first question will need to be addressed in the module, if/when that situation arises.
99.9% of the time "Creatures" refers to monsters, so to the second question: no.

edwin wrote: [Ioun Stone Banshee Prism] also states for spell.

please see the footnote

edwin wrote: [Ralson’s Pendant of the Elder Yew] states any scroll. Is the intent to change the token to limit it to Druid scrolls?

nope, that was a copy& paste error; fixed

edwin wrote: [Ring of the Drake] also states spell.

changed to "Ranged*"

edwin wrote: [Wand of Force Spike] Is this force damage not affected by the 50% miss chance when attacking Incorporeal creatures?

That's an inherent property of Force damage.

edwin wrote: Cumulative Penalty Limitation: Is there a limit regarding how many Scroll Valkyrie Shield can be stacked?

That would fall under the same-name stacking rule as seen near the end of the PHB: Effects from same-named sources don't stack unless specifically stated otherwise.
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections/suggestions in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously.
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #33

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Enjoy Your Burrito
  • Posts: 8659

Mongo wrote: Recipe for [Gem of Last Hope] should be Earcuff "OF" vitality... missing "of"

fixed

Fred K wrote: It might make sense to indicate whether fury requires any kind of action to use for Bog's medallion.

added to both the legendary and relic

Fred K wrote: Arcane set - my memory might be off on this but I thought it was one use of not expending a 0-2 level spell, not the first time one is cast.

first

Fred K wrote: please add a note indicating that multiple bardic instruments do not provide a cumulative benefit.

How is a bard going to play more than one instrument at a time?

Fred K wrote: The transmute recipes don't seem to require anything from 2020 in terms of monster bits.

Please discuss recipes in another thread . That said, it's pretty standard for current year recipes which include Monster Trophies to pull from the previous year. Generally, only "4C" recipes use current-year Trophies.

Fred K wrote: copyright date should be revised to 2020 rather than 2017.

fixed

BeLinda Mathie wrote: should the sentence about one use of psychic power per game be changed to something like "Unless you equip a token providing for additional uses of Psychic Power, only one Psychic Power may be used per person per adventure."?

It is always the case that when a token contradicts a general rule, go with the token. I think the Quick Token Reference would become very sluggish if we re-stated that principle every time we stated a general rule.

edwin wrote: Does Benrow's even allow use of Psychic Power without the aid of another token that provides for use of Psychic Power? Same questions for Necklace of the Spirit Drake,

neither of them imbue psychic power
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections/suggestions in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously.
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #34

Picc wrote: Off topic, I'm not sure how I feel about different vol tokens at different cons...


See my post in the thread started by Wade for some insight
Please visit my fledgling token store.
truedungeon.com/forum?view=topic&catid=583&id=247486
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #35

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Enjoy Your Burrito
  • Posts: 8659
There is a new version:
QTR 2020.04 Beta
If the version you're looking at does not show "September 10" in the footer, please clear your cache and re-download.

Please continue to ignore any odd page breaks.
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections/suggestions in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously.
The topic has been locked.

2020 QTR Beta (please proof) 1 month 1 week ago #36

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Enjoy Your Burrito
  • Posts: 8659

Picc wrote: Off topic, I'm not sure how I feel about different vol tokens at different cons...

Bob Chasan wrote: See my post in the thread started by Wade for some insight

https://truedungeon.com/forum?view=topic&catid=615&id=250470#354819
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections/suggestions in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously.
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.306 seconds