TOPIC: 2026 Transmute Tokens <= Older versions

Please let me know your thoughts on these tokens. I changed the name of the Ring of the Sacred Circle to just "Arcanum Ring" to make it more clear where it belongs. The power of the Charm of the Accursed was finally noticed and fixed. I blame the cold medicine! We will have a 3-piece Arcanum set power published soonish.

Thanks again for all your help.

truedungeon.com/files/Trans_26z.jpg

Jeff, I like the name change so all the Arcanum items are clearly identified. Thanks for the power bump on the Greaves, that is greatly appreciated.

Regarding the Arcanum Ring, shouldn't that be a Grand Eldritch (or Grand Arcanum) instead of a Relic? Also, can you change the power to "+2 to all Attributes,+1 to AC, Saves, DR"? Currently the transmuted Ring is inferior to the UR Rings regarding Saves and AC and DR.

On the name of the ring, it looks like there is space on the token for:

Arcanum Ring of the Sacred Circle

I appreciate bringing the Arcanum relics in line with the size of their transmutes. I have the same question on the ring, as for Premium transmutes previously (Only been 2, Rod and Skull), they turned into a non-relic, on par with Legendary, and denoted as "Grand X". As this is taking 5 premium tokens, I thought Ring of the Sacred Circle would be the first Grand Arcanum item, and also allow entrance into Ring Con. So I just want to understand is the intent for the Arcanum set that ALL items within it will be Relics, regardless of coming from UR or Premium transmutes? If so, then yes Arcanum Ring at relic level makes sense.

Phil

Jeff Martin wrote: Please let me know your thoughts on these tokens. I changed the name of the Ring of the Sacred Circle to just "Arcanum Ring" to make it more clear where it belongs.

For what it's worth, I like the evocative names of the Elemental Eldrtich set pieces (Supreme Ring of Elemental Command, Boots of the Four Winds, etc.) more than the a generic SET_NAME SLOT_NAME naming convention.

I'd go the other way and leave Arcanum Ring with it's wilder name, and also give a wild name to the Arcanum Greaves like:

Greaves of Runetouched Ironwood

or something.

Mike Steele wrote: Regarding the Arcanum Ring, shouldn't that be a Grand Eldritch (or Grand Arcanum) instead of a Relic?

How would you indicate that on the token? Rod of Seven Parts and Skull of Cavadar both have serial numbers an no relic star - so just get rid of the relic star?

With the +3 crossbow: would it be better if it were "on first crit" rather than "on first slide"?

Matthew Hayward wrote:

Mike Steele wrote: Regarding the Arcanum Ring, shouldn't that be a Grand Eldritch (or Grand Arcanum) instead of a Relic?

How would you indicate that on the token? Rod of Seven Parts and Skull of Cavadar both have serial numbers an no relic star - so just get rid of the relic star?

I guess, unless they want to come up with a different symbol. I guess the reason it is a Relic is that it is problematic to individually number them - perhaps there are just too many of them.

Matthew Hayward wrote:

Mike Steele wrote: Regarding the Arcanum Ring, shouldn't that be a Grand Eldritch (or Grand Arcanum) instead of a Relic?

How would you indicate that on the token? Rod of Seven Parts and Skull of Cavadar both have serial numbers an no relic star - so just get rid of the relic star?

I would get rid of the Relic star, and make it full art, and also add a 4 digit code, especially if it is going to be used for Ring Con registration. This would be in line with all other Grand X items, albeit if there are more Rings than Skulls I am adding one more digit.

Phil

Matthew Hayward wrote:

Jeff Martin wrote: Please let me know your thoughts on these tokens. I changed the name of the Ring of the Sacred Circle to just "Arcanum Ring" to make it more clear where it belongs.

For what it's worth, I like the evocative names of the Elemental Eldrtich set pieces (Supreme Ring of Elemental Command, Boots of the Four Winds, etc.) more than the more generic SET_NAME SLOT_NAME naming covention.

I'd go the other way and leave Arcanum Ring with it's wilder name, and also make give a wild name to the Arcanum Greaves like: Greaves of Runetouched Ironwood or something.

+1

The unique color will distinguish the set.

The ring of the sacred circle should keep that name, it sounds a lot better.

Also, I think instead of +2 attributes it should say +2 all abillity scores. This would keep it in line with the Bead of Asgard, which allows +4 to one ability. That way, the wording is the same.

Once again, I like the legendary crossbow but would like to see it go to a plus 5, that said at least it can be used my more classes, so it has a lot more flexibility than assassins crossbow in that regard.

As for the cloaks I personally will not be making them but they are interesting and don’t seem unbalanced.

Charm of the Accursed seems very strong for a charm.

Arcanum Ring - +2 to all attributes?
Are we saying the 6 prime stats, or are we saying +2 focus, +2 saves, +2 to 6 main stats, +2 hp, +2 AC, +2 range and melee to hit and damage.
I am not trying to be difficult, I am generally not sure.