TOPIC: 2024 Special Token Images < Feedback Please!

See FAQ for info more
This rhyme is short 'cuz wit I am poor

truedungeon.com/files/CS24_Round02_Special.jpg

I don't love another new slot with everything else going on. I do like the idea of something cool with $2k orders though.

Kirk Bauer wrote: I don't love another new slot with everything else going on. I do like the idea of something cool with $2k orders though.

I mentioned this in the FAQ thread but if we have Mark of Enlightenment with a relic level power and this being a relic will there be room for multiple marks or will players need to choose between enlightment and these? If we do have multiple mark slots I'd make sure these say can't be used with other Tenet marks.

The previous thread mentioned there will only be one Mark/Tattoo slot

Would there be a possibility for 4-Star light blue healing potions in the $8,000 orders, such as Condensed Healing or Healer’s Rum?

Ho-Yi Fung wrote: The previous thread mentioned there will only be one Mark/Tattoo slot

Thanks, I missed it. Wondering how much more powerfull the Mark of Enlightenment will be over the Relic proposed here. Might be worth hashing that out before we checkbox this one, maybe this one should be +2 instead?

Totem Paint Crushed Ruby , a standard pack rare from 2019, provides +4 max HP. Should Averon's Ale be bumped up to match?

Ho-Yi Fung wrote: Totem Paint Crushed Ruby , a standard pack rare from 2019, provides +4 max HP. Should Averon's Ale be bumped up to match?

Great point. Should be +4hp.

Sorry, just wanted to double-down on my previous post. I love the idea of a $2k bonus (since we don't have modules any longer and AG badges are virtually useless for anybody making large purchases since we get so many of them). So I like the idea of a good UR, and I like the idea of a transmute for those (otherwise we'll just get too many of the same tokens that we can't use). But I didn't like introducing another new slot right now.

But then I realized that the Paths to Enlightenment also transmute into a "Mark", so that makes it even worse if I'm understanding everything correctly. Anybody who buys $2ks will get a Mark of the Tenants but that won't be useful for anybody who is going for a Mark of Enlightenment. It seems contradictory.

I have a BIG suggestion for handling these new slot concepts (marks, spirit pets) and some older ones (tomes, lamps, chalice) and I'd like to get some opinions. Today we have "slots" and we also have "slotless" tokens, and then things like tomes that feel kind of in the middle to me -- there isn't a tome slot, yet there are a bunch of tome tokens.

What if we have a new type of token called "limited" -- it doesn't take a slot, nor is it slotless. By default, you can have ONE of each type of limited token (tome, mark, spirit pets, lamps, chalices), but there is also a limit on the TOTAL number of "limited" tokens, say 3 by default. Then you can have some tokens or attributes that independently affect each parameter -- you could have a token that lets you equip an additional mark in the future, but a separate token that expanded your max "limited" slots.

Kirk Bauer wrote: I have a BIG suggestion for handling these new slot concepts (marks, spirit pets) and some older ones (tomes, lamps, chalice) and I'd like to get some opinions. Today we have "slots" and we also have "slotless" tokens, and then things like tomes that feel kind of in the middle to me -- there isn't a tome slot, yet there are a bunch of tome tokens.

What if we have a new type of token called "limited" -- it doesn't take a slot, nor is it slotless. By default, you can have ONE of each type of limited token (tome, mark, spirit pets, lamps, chalices), but there is also a limit on the TOTAL number of "limited" tokens, say 3 by default. Then you can have some tokens or attributes that independently affect each parameter -- you could have a token that lets you equip an additional mark in the future, but a separate token that expanded your max "limited" slots.

+1 to this

Kirk Bauer wrote: Sorry, just wanted to double-down on my previous post. I love the idea of a $2k bonus (since we don't have modules any longer and AG badges are virtually useless for anybody making large purchases since we get so many of them). So I like the idea of a good UR, and I like the idea of a transmute for those (otherwise we'll just get too many of the same tokens that we can't use). But I didn't like introducing another new slot right now.

But then I realized that the Paths to Enlightenment also transmute into a "Mark", so that makes it even worse if I'm understanding everything correctly. Anybody who buys $2ks will get a Mark of the Tenants but that won't be useful for anybody who is going for a Mark of Enlightenment. It seems contradictory.

I have a BIG suggestion for handling these new slot concepts (marks, spirit pets) and some older ones (tomes, lamps, chalice) and I'd like to get some opinions. Today we have "slots" and we also have "slotless" tokens, and then things like tomes that feel kind of in the middle to me -- there isn't a tome slot, yet there are a bunch of tome tokens.

What if we have a new type of token called "limited" -- it doesn't take a slot, nor is it slotless. By default, you can have ONE of each type of limited token (tome, mark, spirit pets, lamps, chalices), but there is also a limit on the TOTAL number of "limited" tokens, say 3 by default. Then you can have some tokens or attributes that independently affect each parameter -- you could have a token that lets you equip an additional mark in the future, but a separate token that expanded your max "limited" slots.

I'd rather just limit slotless as a whole at that point.

I’m against limiting slotless items that each player can use. I have spent a long time collecting any that could help and even those that couldn’t for my current class just Incase I shifted to a different one. Limiting slotless will have made my last decade of collecting a complete waste.