Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: 2023 Completion token ideas?

2023 Completion token ideas? 2 years 8 months ago #1

  • Endgame
  • Endgame's Avatar Topic Author
  • Away
  • 10th Level
  • Supporter
  • Posts: 4791
Should we have a thread for completion token ideas?

Target rare completion tokens somewhere better than rare but not as good as 4*. UC completion tokens around booster Rare.

In an ideal world, I think we do something that doesn’t heavily eat into design space as well, so it might mean “boring variation” on items. Some examples

Ear cuff of the sacred variations:
+2 hp, -2 X damage (could make around 12 more different versions of these). Uncommon version is only - damage.

Ring of resistance: +5 to 1 save (rare), +3 (UC).

Ioun stone: +1 all saves, -2 X damage (baby Topaz Trilliant ). UC is just - damage.

Ioun stone: +2 to a single save. UC is +1.

Bracers of damage: +2 element to a single damage type for melee. Can make another set for missile. Can make another set for spells. This could be like 30 completion tokens.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2023 Completion token ideas? 2 years 8 months ago #2

Not a fan of +5 to one save. Too similar to transmute.

+2 to two different saves is same number of tokens and may be better than a normal rare in some cases. Uncommon obviously +1 to two saves.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2023 Completion token ideas? 2 years 8 months ago #3

  • Endgame
  • Endgame's Avatar Topic Author
  • Away
  • 10th Level
  • Supporter
  • Posts: 4791

Ian Lee wrote: Not a fan of +5 to one save. Too similar to transmute.

It perfectly splits the difference between the rare +4 ring and the transmute +6. Might be boring for vets, but seems to be ideal power level wise for the rare level player.

Ian Lee wrote: +2 to two different saves is same number of tokens and may be better than a normal rare in some cases. Uncommon obviously +1 to two saves.

I didn’t quite follow this. Instead of +2 to, say, will save, you’re suggesting it be +2 fort and +2 will? While that is still less powerful than the +2 all saves iouns, I think I’d err on the side of less power and keep it +2 single save, or possibly +2 and +1 (ex +2 fort, +1 will)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.078 seconds