TOPIC: E1 7(or 8?) Token Challenge

jedibcg wrote:

Wade Schwendemann wrote: So, times have been posted.

I would like to target 2:36, 2:48, 3 pm in that order for this run.
Given that we will be doing rather small builds, I will plan to do the party card in advance too, which should allow anyone to join us in coaching if necessary.
Does that work for everyone?

I thought we were shooting for earlier on Thursday? Time is fine for me I (like you) just have E2 to do after this so just checking that we didn't want something earlier.

Disregard just saw that those are the earliest runs for Thursday.

Unfortunately, there is nothing earlier on Thursday.

Harlax wrote:

jedibcg wrote:

Wade Schwendemann wrote: So, times have been posted.

I would like to target 2:36, 2:48, 3 pm in that order for this run.
Given that we will be doing rather small builds, I will plan to do the party card in advance too, which should allow anyone to join us in coaching if necessary.
Does that work for everyone?

I thought we were shooting for earlier on Thursday? Time is fine for me I (like you) just have E2 to do after this so just checking that we didn't want something earlier.

Disregard just saw that those are the earliest runs for Thursday.

Unfortunately, there is nothing earlier on Thursday.

Since Harlax is trying to keep the Team Synergy run from colliding with this, I'm good with those times.

Harlax wrote:

jedibcg wrote:

Wade Schwendemann wrote: So, times have been posted.

I would like to target 2:36, 2:48, 3 pm in that order for this run.
Given that we will be doing rather small builds, I will plan to do the party card in advance too, which should allow anyone to join us in coaching if necessary.
Does that work for everyone?

I thought we were shooting for earlier on Thursday? Time is fine for me I (like you) just have E2 to do after this so just checking that we didn't want something earlier.

Disregard just saw that those are the earliest runs for Thursday.

Unfortunately, there is nothing earlier on Thursday.

Hence my last line in your quote that says literally, “Disregard just saw that those are the earliest runs for Thursday."

I'm good as long as it is sometime Thursday, Friday, or Saturday...

Beertram wrote: I'm good as long as it is sometime Thursday, Friday, or Saturday...

LOL!

Beertram wrote: I'm good as long as it is sometime Thursday, Friday, or Saturday...

Can Do!

Since WYC is over I figure we should necro this and finalize builds and get them to someone to do a party card. Sound good?

jedibcg wrote: Since WYC is over I figure we should necro this and finalize builds and get them to someone to do a party card. Sound good?

Sounds great. Who's playing what?

Justice wrote:

jedibcg wrote: Since WYC is over I figure we should necro this and finalize builds and get them to someone to do a party card. Sound good?

Sounds great. Who's playing what?

See the first post for a general idea.

I think it is working out to
1. Wade: Elf Wizard or Melee Ranger
2. Harlax: Barbarian
3. JediBCG Paladin or Ranged Ranger
4. Justice: Melee class
5. Edwin: Bard Troubador?
6. Fred K: Rogue
7. JPotter: an opportunity to play a class I've never played
8. Beertram: Druid
9. Ralykam: Wizard
10.Fiddy: Cleric


You said melee class so that would be a fighter or the Paladin or monk.
JPotter wants to play something he hasn't played before. Not certain what that means.

I am willing to flex into another class. We need someone to play monk, someone to play paladin. There is a debate about needing a range ranger or not.

I guess I'm just not sure which is better for us, a ranged ranger or an elf wizard?

Damage wise I think the elf wizard, particularly in only 3 combats, will beat a ranged ranger. Plus it gives alertness once. Some of that will depend on whether or not we have a bard troubador or not I suppose.

I agree we need a monk, 2 slides per round is too good. If we wanted, I suppose we could eliminate both fighters, have a melee ranger and use both wizards as our primary ranged damage dealers.

I will let JPotter post which classes he would like. I did confirm with Beertram about Druid.

Wade Schwendemann wrote: I guess I'm just not sure which is better for us, a ranged ranger or an elf wizard?

Damage wise I think the elf wizard, particularly in only 3 combats, will beat a ranged ranger. Plus it gives alertness once. Some of that will depend on whether or not we have a bard troubador or not I suppose.

I agree we need a monk, 2 slides per round is too good. If we wanted, I suppose we could eliminate both fighters, have a melee ranger and use both wizards as our primary ranged damage dealers.

I will let JPotter post which classes he would like. I did confirm with Beertram about Druid.

Sorry I don't mean the debate is Elf Wizard vs Ranged Ranger. I mean Ranged Ranger vs Melee Ranger.

I think it is fine to go two wizards. I just think having another dedicated Range damage dealer isn't going to hurt as much as losing a the melee.

DLTR: I think a ranger is the last class (after paladin and monk) just a question if it should be melee or range. Basically we should cut the fighters, imo.

jedibcg wrote:

Wade Schwendemann wrote: I guess I'm just not sure which is better for us, a ranged ranger or an elf wizard?

Damage wise I think the elf wizard, particularly in only 3 combats, will beat a ranged ranger. Plus it gives alertness once. Some of that will depend on whether or not we have a bard troubador or not I suppose.

I agree we need a monk, 2 slides per round is too good. If we wanted, I suppose we could eliminate both fighters, have a melee ranger and use both wizards as our primary ranged damage dealers.

I will let JPotter post which classes he would like. I did confirm with Beertram about Druid.

Sorry I don't mean the debate is Elf Wizard vs Ranged Ranger. I mean Ranged Ranger vs Melee Ranger.

I think it is fine to go two wizards. I just think having another dedicated Range damage dealer isn't going to hurt as much as losing a the melee.

DLTR: I think a ranger is the last class (after paladin and monk) just a question if it should be melee or range. Basically we should cut the fighters, imo.

Agreed. I will play any of those classes, with the exception of a shield wall Paladin, which I would draw straws to play.