TOPIC: Token Database 2.0

lazlo_hollyfeld1985 wrote:

edwin wrote: Just noticed that under each individual 2020 Monster Bits they are denoted as Ingredient for: Ring of Fervor.

Yes. They are and???

My bad. Transmute recipes updated to allow any 2020 Monster bit.

edwin wrote: Just noticed that under each individual 2020 Monster Bits they are denoted as Ingredient for: Ring of Fervor.

edwin wrote: In Transmute recipes only the 2019 Monster Bits are listed as an option.

In the TDb , this beta QTR, and on Token Exchange Program page , the recipe for Ring of Fervor requires (among other things) one of the following:

• any 2020 Monster Trophy
  
• Blight Bud
• Fiend Talon
• Lamia Scale
• Slayer Tentacle
• Stalker Blood
• Swamp Hag Venom

Where are you seeing otherwise?

Side Note: In checking on this, I see that this beta QTR had an error in the main ingredient for Ring of Fervor. It should be Ring of Jealous Fervor not 1× 100 GP Silver [Ruby or Sapphire] Skull. That has been corrected and will appear in the next update.

Just didn't realize it before. Had in my mind just last years monster bits.

edwin wrote: Just didn't realize it before. Had in my mind just last years monster bits.

this is usually done so new players can try to make something

Shouldn’t the Hitchhiking Ghosts be changed to the ghost slot?

I saw Figurines had been changed to their slot, but not the ghosts.

To the best of my recollection, there has always been a Figurine slot in the TDb. Since their debut in 2012, there has been at least one Figurine of Power every year. I don't know of any plans to make ghosts a recurring thing. If they become a regular thing, it would probably be appropriate to make them their own slot. But for now, I think keeping them slotless in the TDb is fine. If you would like to think of them as being in the ghost slot, by all means do so.

I never realized that, my apologies.

I just noticed that the following 2005 tokens are all listed with a rarity of "nonstandard fill," but each of them have a text color that corresponds to a rarity.

Since it's currently this way for all of these tokens, I assume it was on purpose, but if not I'm bringing it up to be possibly addressed.

Should be Uncommon?
+1 Mug of Brawling
Mug of Beauty
Mug of Courage
Mug of Wisdom

Should be Rare?
Bag of Holding

Should be Ultra Rare?
Bucknard’s Everfull Mug

Those rarities are deliberate.

The +1 Mithral Long Sword has an extra Mitrhal Boots under Mithral Sextet description before the list.

tokendb.com/token/1-mithral-long-sword/

Mithral Sextet
When six items are equipped, in addition to the Trio and Quintet bonuses, the +1 Mithral Long Sword will instantly kill a dragon if the player slides a natural 20 and the 8 or 9 on its damage wheel is closest to the damage dot on the combat board.
Mithral Boots

Mithral Boots

+1 Mithral Long Sword no longer has four feet.

Jedibcg, please enjoy some vuvuzela-free milk.

Potential minor typo on the entry for Scroll Create Water:
tokendb.com/token/scroll-create-water/

Caster creates one quart of water inside a vessel. The container must be able of holding the water or the scroll’s magic is wasted and this token will still be collected by the DM.

Should the bolded word "able" be "capable" instead?

Thank you!