TOPIC: Proof of the Ten Mark of Enlightenment Token Templates

Wade Schwendemann (Dr. Uid) wrote: Would Saint Gubb be better as Do not turn in shown Eldritch Runestone?
I'm overthinking of course, but that seems clearer than used

Or to make it simpler could be something like "Grants effect of Eldritch Runestone"

Kusig wrote:

Wade Schwendemann (Dr. Uid) wrote: Would Saint Gubb be better as Do not turn in shown Eldritch Runestone?
I'm overthinking of course, but that seems clearer than used

Or to make it simpler could be something like "Grants effect of Eldritch Runestone"

Except I believe the intent is for people to have to have one, else I would agree with you

Wade Schwendemann (Dr. Uid) wrote: Would Saint Gubb be better as Do not turn in shown Eldritch Runestone?
I'm overthinking of course, but that seems clearer than used

How about. "Show Eldritch Runestone to gain it's effect."

Rob F wrote:

Wade Schwendemann (Dr. Uid) wrote: Would Saint Gubb be better as Do not turn in shown Eldritch Runestone?
I'm overthinking of course, but that seems clearer than used

How about. "Show Eldritch Runestone to gain it's effect."

+ 1

I actually really liked this when I read it. You show it, not turn in. Easy, short and direct. If we need more information they can check TD.db and it can be explained more in depth. I think we also need to remember no matter how clear, someone may overthink it or be confused. These are not going to be common tokens. Those who are making them should know the basics and about checking TD.db to get more information

With the new text for Raya and Valla, they all look good to me.

Tyraël The Just wrote:

Rob F wrote:

Wade Schwendemann (Dr. Uid) wrote: Would Saint Gubb be better as Do not turn in shown Eldritch Runestone?
I'm overthinking of course, but that seems clearer than used

How about. "Show Eldritch Runestone to gain it's effect."

+ 1

I actually really liked this when I read it. You show it, not turn in. Easy, short and direct. If we need more information they can check TD.db and it can be explained more in depth. I think we also need to remember no matter how clear, someone may overthink it or be confused. These are not going to be common tokens. Those who are making them should know the basics and about checking TD.db to get more information

It is a good idea, but unfortunately -- the text will not fit.

Jeff Martin wrote:

Tyraël The Just wrote:

Rob F wrote:

Wade Schwendemann (Dr. Uid) wrote: Would Saint Gubb be better as Do not turn in shown Eldritch Runestone?
I'm overthinking of course, but that seems clearer than used

How about. "Show Eldritch Runestone to gain it's effect."

+ 1

I actually really liked this when I read it. You show it, not turn in. Easy, short and direct. If we need more information they can check TD.db and it can be explained more in depth. I think we also need to remember no matter how clear, someone may overthink it or be confused. These are not going to be common tokens. Those who are making them should know the basics and about checking TD.db to get more information

It is a good idea, but unfortunately -- the text will not fit.

Maybe first line:

"Eldritch Runestone"

and second line:

"effect if shown."

Or use the following:

Eldritch Runestone
Show--Gain Effect

John Ohlinger (Salsa John) wrote: Or use the following:

Eldritch Runestone
Show--Gain Effect

That makes it sound like there's an Eldritch Runestone Show (which would be cool). And you gain the effect of the show.

How's this?

I think that's a very clear wording. I think all these tokens are looking very good at this point!

Jeff Martin wrote: How's this?

Really good.