TOPIC: Source discussion

Druegar wrote: Please have source discussions in another thread.

kurtreznor wrote: Are you saying that his query is invalid and no changes will be made, per some official decision? Or are you saying that he should come back after a discussion and some concensus has been reached on the subject?

Honestly, I didn't understand what was being asked. I probably just need more sleep, but it seemed to me like an open discussion which, as you know, I prefer to have outside of the TDb thread.

Regardless, thank you for clarifying.

kurtreznor wrote: Could you add another 'source' tag of 'unique' or something similar for tokens acquired by special circumstance (such as all those mentioned above), and then include a paragraph in each of their description about how they were distributed?

Source values are generally easy to add, going back and editing multiple tokens may not be so easy. I'm not suggesting there would be a ton of your proposed "unique" acquisition tokens, I'm just speaking in general terms.

It comes down to the need/value of adding the new feature. Is there a genuine need for the new feature or is it minutiae that only ~two people will notice or care about?

Side Note: I consider genuine errors, even minor ones, to be worthwhile changes.

No additional value at this time may be necessary. To keep the TDb consistent, please consider changing the following token Sources to existing values.

Necklace of the Oak -> Dungeon Only
Harpy Claw Amulet -> Dungeon Only
Ring of the Hallowed -> Appreciation

If there's a reason to have any of these stay Completion as the Initial Distribution Source, please let me know.

Thanks.