Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Token Database 2.0

Token Database 2.0 5 years 6 months ago #877

If I turned in Hourglass of Answers , would the Oracle of Muti tell me that it's not usable in-game anymore?
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 6 months ago #878

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Semper Inutilia
  • Posts: 10509
Probably not
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 6 months ago #879

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Semper Inutilia
  • Posts: 10509
Medallion of Mystic Mouth now clearly spells out that it cannot be used to double-cast the exact same wand in a single round.

There is already a wand thread if you wish to voice your opinion abut this clarification.
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 6 months ago #880

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Semper Inutilia
  • Posts: 10509
Updated all wands to reflect the new wand usage process

There are two tokens that received an additional tweak: The Cumulative Penalty Limitation still applies, so both of those have soft caps.

There is already a wand thread if you have quemments about these changes.
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 5 months ago #881

+2 Stunning Lt. Crossbow is missing its rarity. I am pretty sure there is 1 more 2019 missing its rarity, but I didn't see it.

I figure Lenses of Divine Sight and Cloak of Shadowskin have their 2019 left often until they change and the new text is added?
You either discover a star or you don't. You arrogant punk.
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 5 months ago #882

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Semper Inutilia
  • Posts: 10509

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.

Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 5 months ago #883

Jumping the gun appreciated, as is the work it required!

I've noticed that Bolt of Frost and Charm of Rampage are duplicated now. If you choose to combine them, I'd recommend keeping the previous ones, so your IDs aren't "bolt-of-frost-2" and "charm-of-rampage-2".

I know the 2014 version of Cloak of Shadowskin is obsolete starting 2020, but should it still have a 2014 year association? I understand that's a tricky situation. (Edit: ah, because the stat block would be vastly different)

Nice work!
Last edit: by Wyld.
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 5 months ago #884

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Semper Inutilia
  • Posts: 10509
Okay boos and ghouls, the 2019s are all in. Dissect away! :cheer:
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 5 months ago #885

  • Trent
  • Trent's Avatar
  • Away
  • 10th Level
  • Supporter
  • www.TrentTokens.com
  • Posts: 3404
I'm in the market for a Mithral Coin of Fate ( tokendb.com/token/mithral-coin-of-fate/ ), and after talking to a few different people, there seems to be confusion about the range of years it's usable to turn in this token for.

I know that the description of a TDb page is used to explain further details about the token, as in what can't fit on the token, but the current description of this token could be interpreted to conflict with the text on the token.

Text on Token:
Redeem for any 2007-2012 token except Artifact, Relic, Wish or Legendary

This clearly says the token you may get will be either a 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, or 2012 token.*

And this has been my understanding, and the understanding of everyone I've ever spoken to about it, with the exception of a few people I recently discussed this token with.

First sentence of description:
The owner of this token may exchange it for any other token printed in 2007 or later (subject to availability), if it’s one of the following rarities.

This clearly says the token you may get (if available) will be either a 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, etc. token.*

* Of course, when I say token that it can be redeemed for, I mean subject to availability and within the acceptable parameters, which is clear on the TDb page:

  • Common
  • Uncommon
  • Rare
  • Ultra Rare
  • Premium
  • Combo (1C, 2C, 3C, 4C, Trade)
  • Monster Trophy
  • Lore
  • Trade
  • Transmuted-Enhanced (3 point star)
  • Transmuted-Exalted (4 point star)

So the question is, subject to availability, which year range is correct? The text on token (2007 - 2012), or the first sentence of the description (2007 - present year)?

Thanks!

:)
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 5 months ago #886

  • Druegar
  • Druegar's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • 9th Level
  • Supporter
  • Semper Inutilia
  • Posts: 10509
Short answer: anything* after 2007

Long answer: In 2013, Jeff extended it to include 2013 tokens. In 2014, Jeff extended it to include 2014 tokens. In 2015, Jeff extended it to include 2015 tokens. I asked him if he intended it to be for any token printed after 2007. Jeff said yes. Because I am lazy, I changed the description to "2007 or later" so I didn't have to update it annually.


*We all know that doesn't literally mean ANYthing, right?
Have you looked it up in the TDb ?
Please post TDb corrections in this thread .
If I write something in teal, it should not be taken seriously
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 5 months ago #887

  • Trent
  • Trent's Avatar
  • Away
  • 10th Level
  • Supporter
  • www.TrentTokens.com
  • Posts: 3404

Druegar wrote: Short answer: anything* after 2007

Long answer: In 2013, Jeff extended it to include 2013 tokens. In 2014, Jeff extended it to include 2014 tokens. In 2015, Jeff extended it to include 2015 tokens. I asked him if he intended it to be for any token printed after 2007. Jeff said yes. Because I am lazy, I changed the description to "2007 or later" so I didn't have to update it annually.


*We all know that doesn't literally mean ANYthing, right?


OK, thanks for the explanation. I would suggest something more clear in the description, but I'm not sure if others agree, or if this token warrants it.
The topic has been locked.

Token Database 2.0 5 years 5 months ago #888

I found the following without classifications:
Charm of the Faithful
Enchanter's Whetstone
Ring of the Yeti
Shell Armor
Totem Amulet

Certainly some others are deemed unclassifiable; not sure if the whetstone is one of those or not.

The following (pre-2019) tokens do not have slots:

Carter's Eldritch Doubler (I'm assuming slotless)
Ring of Pandemonium
Last edit: by Wyld.
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.113 seconds