TOPIC: Token Database 2.0

Gnomish Throwing Hammer is no longer mis-classified as a non-magical weapon (or to phrase it without the double negative, it's now correctly classified as a magical weapon)

Converted all instances of "hostile actions" to "offensive actions" and presented them as bullet lists to make them easier to read. Even though "hostile" and "offensive" meant the same thing game-wise, the inconsistency has been eliminated. (hopefully I got them all)

Added this sentence to the description for Rod of Seven Parts
A sub-class character may not duplicate a standard class character in the same party. E.g., a party may not contain both a Rogue and an Assassin.

This is not a new ruling. In fact, it's been the case since the sub-classes debuted.

Could Arcane Recipe (2009, 2010, 2011) and Feedback Loop (2007) have years associated, in addition to being yearless?

These tokens seem to be missing an Exchange Program Classification (not exchangeable):


These tokens may need an "Ingredient For" association, assuming that the transmuted item's description is accurate:


On the other hand, 30 GP (Coral) may not need to be an ingredient for Gem of Blinding?

Are there good Damage Type associations for these Weapon tokens? Maybe not for the Lager and Water.


Potion Polymorph (Scrael) doesn't have a Damage Type, Weapon Attack Mode or Weapon Medium.

Potion Polymorph (Giant Spider) is the only one that has a "two-hand melee" Weapon Medium - in possible opposition to the token description?

Thanks for reading, and either fixing the token entries or fixing my perspective!

The uniqueness of Arcane Recipe and Feedback Loop leave them outside a specific year's classification.
Earcuff of Energy is now flagged as not exchangeable
Hand of Glory is now flagged as not exchangeable
Lenses of Vital Insight is now flagged as not exchangeable
Minotaur Horn of Alert is now flagged as not exchangeable
Ring of Evasion is now flagged as not exchangeable
Ring of Riches is now flagged as not exchangeable
Scythe of Reaping is now flagged as not exchangeable
Skull of Doom is now flagged as not exchangeable
Spider Pin (Artisan) is now flagged as not exchangeable
TaMor's +4 Mithral Bracers is now flagged as not exchangeable
Templar Helmet is now flagged as not exchangeable
Templar Shield is now flagged as not exchangeable
Wil's Dragonheart is now flagged as not exchangeable

When the "Ingredient For" category was created, recipes that were no longer viable were not added to it.
30 GP (Coral) is no longer listed as in ingredient for Gem of Blinding . I'm not sure why it was retro-fitted to be an ingredient for Jar of Courage , but since there may have been a good reason, I'm content to let it stand.

+1 Dune Stalker Javelin now deals piercing damage
+1 Iron Bastard Axe now deals slashing damage
Elven Falchion now deals slashing damage
The damage type for Holy Lager & Holy Water doesn't really fit into a neat category, but I think their descriptions make it clear what they do.
As stated on the token itself, Weighted Net does not deal damage

I have no idea what damage type scrael deal--the module doesn't specify. Unless someone can provide a definitive source, Potion Polymorph (Scrael) 's damage type will remain unclassified.

Potion Polymorph (Giant Spider) is no longer flagged as a two-handed weapon

David McClure, please enjoy some milk.

Thanks! Does the damage type "Does not deal HP damage" apply to Weighted Net then?

David McClure wrote: Does the damage type "Does not deal HP damage" apply to Weighted Net ?

now it does

Gauntlets of Ogre Power have the Exchange Token Classification as Mystic Silk. But the new Gauntlets of the Midgard Serpent show "DP" on the top signifying Darkwood Plank as the trade classification. Which one is correct?

Should any of these tokens be classified as "Gear"? I'm thinking they should be, or at least classified as something.

Gem of Blinding
Smokestick
Tanglefoot Bag
Horn of Blasting
Satyr's Pipes of Dancing
Lamp of the Marid
Lamp of the Efreeti

It doesn't have to be gear, but I noticed that they don't have any type (e.g. like Flask of Sharing, which is set as gear)

Kirk Bauer wrote: Should any of these tokens be classified as "Gear"?
Gem of Blinding
Smokestick
Tanglefoot Bag
Horn of Blasting
Satyr's Pipes of Dancing
Lamp of the Marid
Lamp of the Efreeti

In my mind, no.
To me, " Gear " refers to a role-playing item that has a rather nebulous purpose. All of the aforementioned items have specified in-game functions.

To that end, Flask of Sharing is no longer classified as Gear.

Kirk, please enjoy some milk.

That's a good definition of Gear, Druegar. With that, is there a case to be made for these -not- being Gear, since their purpose is more well-defined?

50 GP Ebony Scroll Tube
Alchemist Pouch
Alchemist Purse
Arcane Scroll Tube
Bone Map Case
Bone Scroll Case
Greater Arcane Scroll Tube
Sea Dragon Scroll Tube

Also, randomly:

Golden Apple of Eris : Text on Token misspells Soulforged as "Solforged".
Carter's Eldritch Doubler : This does not mention the Text on Token, but I can understand if that was intentional.

Hee hee, I knew someone would ask about the tubes. I came thiiiiis close to preemptively explaining why they are classified they way they are.

In my mind, the vanilla scroll cases are gear. They have a kind of function, but it's a bit wibbly wobbly (though not timey wimey.) When the improved versions were born, it felt weird having the evolved* versions not be gear as well, so they got "grandfathered" into the gear category.

Golden Apple of Eris 's ToT gained a "u"
Carter’s Eldritch Doubler now has ToT

David McClure, please enjoy some milk.


*I may be playing too much PoGO